Science Wednesday: Witnessing History

Each week we write about the science behind environmental protection. Previous Science Wednesdays.

By Lyndee Collins

What is it about C-SPAN that lulls some people to sleep? It’s as if the sound of debate compares to crashing waves on a shore or trickling water. As I prepared to attend my very first congressional hearing, I couldn’t help but question if I had had enough coffee that morning.

As a new EPA intern, I attended the Oversight Hearing on Public Health and Drinking Water Issues so I could gain a better understanding of environmental policy. The hearing I attended was about the chemical perchlorate, a naturally occurring and man-made chemical deemed unhealthy by EPA scientific research. Traces of the chemical have been found in public water systems all around the country, sparking concern and the hearing I attended.

EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson at the hearing.The hearing started, cameras began to roll, and I-expecting a fight with my eyelids-was wide awake and engaged. I guess I can officially call myself a nerd now, but I actually enjoyed the hearing.

Listening to senators speak their opinions and witnessing all of the fuss around the room was much more engaging than I had predicted. Every question, opinion, and answer sparked a new topic of concern. Voices were raised, facial expressions varied, and conversations around the room echoed. I soon realized there was much more involved in a hearing than what could be captured through a lens.

I was particularly excited to see EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson testify. She announced that EPA would indeed move forward with the development of a regulation to protect drinking water from perchlorate.

As she entered the room my eyes followed her until she took her chair. I couldn’t help but feel a little star struck when she entered. This was my first time to put a face to a name I had heard so frequently in the office. She took her seat and delivered a remarkable speech about her concerns for America’s drinking water, especially protecting it from contamination from harmful chemicals such as perchlorate.

“Our decisions are based on extensive review of the best available science and the health needs of the American people,” Jackson announced.

The hearing allowed me to gain true insight of how EPA science is used to protect human health.  EPA will continue to evaluate the science on perchlorate health effects and its occurrence in public water systems.

About the Author: Lyndee Collins is an intern from Indiana University currently working with the science communication team in EPA’s Office of Research and Development.

Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed in Greenversations are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

Editor's Note: The views expressed here are intended to explain EPA policy. They do not change anyone's rights or obligations. You may share this post. However, please do not change the title or the content, or remove EPA’s identity as the author. If you do make substantive changes, please do not attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.

EPA's official web site is Some links on this page may redirect users from the EPA website to specific content on a non-EPA, third-party site. In doing so, EPA is directing you only to the specific content referenced at the time of publication, not to any other content that may appear on the same webpage or elsewhere on the third-party site, or be added at a later date.

EPA is providing this link for informational purposes only. EPA cannot attest to the accuracy of non-EPA information provided by any third-party sites or any other linked site. EPA does not endorse any non-government websites, companies, internet applications or any policies or information expressed therein.