Skip to content

Woodstove Emissions as Offsets

2011 August 26

(from Jill Inahara, OR DEQ)

We have an area that exceeded the PM2.5 standard but has not yet been designated as a nonattainment area. The exceedances have occurred at night in the winter time so it’s most likely due to woodstove emissions. There is a company that wants to install a cogeneration facility but cannot get all the offsets it needs from industrial sources. Do you know of any instances where states have used woodstove upgrades/changeouts to offset industrial emissions?

Click here to reply.

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed here are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

Please share this post. However, please don't change the title or the content. If you do make changes, don't attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.

One Response leave one →
  1. August 29, 2011

    We asked John Crouch of HPBA if he knew of any projects. His response follows:

    There was a project in California not too long ago. Three Mountain Power built a facility in Burney, Calif and worked with the Calif CEC and the Shasta APCD on permit details.

    Three Mt obtained regional offsets for their Operating Nox (they were to be a Nat Gas plant), but needed woodstove changeouts for PM-10 offsets. They offered $1250/unit conversion to any fuel from old woodstoves, within a set radius of the plant, which included most of the little town.

    There was also an project proposed in Oregon, years ago, which did not go forward which proposed offsets.


Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS