Skip to content

Your Voice Matters to EPA’s IRIS Program

2012 November 7

By Kacee Deener

Last month, I attended an internal EPA meeting to discuss plans for developing an Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) assessment for inorganic arsenic. The purpose of the meeting was to talk with EPA’s regulatory programs about the scope of the assessment.

An IRIS assessment is only part of the information EPA uses to make decisions—it provides information about the chemical’s hazard and the relationship between the dose of the chemical and the magnitude of the biological response or health effect. I know from my days as a public health student that IRIS is really important to environmental and public health practitioners in EPA and across the country—they use the database every day to help inform decisions to protect public health. So it’s important that we understand what questions people may have to answer about a chemical before beginning an assessment. This helps us appreciate the big picture of the work we’re doing; it also helps us focus the assessment so it’s most useful to the people who use IRIS. For example:

  • Are there upcoming rules where inorganic arsenic will be a risk driver?
  • Are EPA regions facing decisions about cleaning up sites contaminated with inorganic arsenic?
  • What types of toxicity values does the Agency and other stakeholders need to do its work?

These are just some of the questions that were asked during this internal meeting.

This type of meeting will become more common in the IRIS Program. However, we won’t just meet internally about these questions. We want to expand the conversation about IRIS with all stakeholders, including state and local health agencies, industry, environmental and public health organizations, the general public, and any individual or group that has an impact on, an interest in, or could be affected by an IRIS assessment.

We understand that IRIS assessments inform the decisions that EPA makes every day to protect public health and the environment. We know these decisions can have a big impact on human health, the environment, and the economy. Because of this, stakeholder engagement is critical to promote transparency and understand the views and input of those impacted by IRIS.

On November 13, we will hold a public stakeholder meeting about IRIS, and we are inviting anyone who’s interested to participate. But this is only the beginning—we plan to have an ongoing dialogue with stakeholders about the IRIS Program and specific IRIS assessments. We are interested in hearing what you think, so come join us on November 13. We would love to hear from you!

About the author: Kacee Deener is the Communications Director in EPA’s National Center for Environmental Assessment, home of the IRIS Program. She joined EPA 12 years ago and has a Masters degree in Public Health.

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed here are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action.

Please share this post. However, please don't change the title or the content. If you do make changes, don't attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.

3 Responses leave one →
  1. Arman.- permalink
    November 7, 2012

    Big Impact ? : No Problem……..

    At least,Superstorm Sandy warned us that the disasters are threaten people around the world, including U.S. The panic people should less if they receive transparency information, like the EPA’s IRIS Program, so we hope everything you know should be inform to the people……!

  2. Master Melvin M. Lusterio permalink
    November 8, 2012

    The Good Force be with you!

    Very nice, Kacee! Thanks for the invite!

    Arsenic is poisonous. We must handle it carefully. Its waste must be separated and be put in a sealed container to avoid contamination.

    I am thinking of how its chemical composition be broken down and put into good use to protect our environment.

    Live forever and prosper!

  3. Cathy Schnur permalink
    November 9, 2012

    A standard must be set. At a fly ash landfill in Sheboygan Wi there is arsenic in the monitoring wells, yet when the private wells were tested a few hundred feet away , arsenic was detected and the homeowners were told arsenic was naturally occuring along Lake Michigan. That may be true, and I may have believed it if it weren’t for the fact, it is an unlined landfill sitting in a wetland. No one told the homeowners that there are three types of arsenic, organic, inorganic and tri valent. By saying that arsenic is naturally occuring, the DNR is giving the public a false sense of security, the test they performed only detected arsenic, not the form of arsenic. The truth may hurt the coal industry, but the public has the right to know the type of toxins in their water. An apple seed has natural arsenic, what is in flyash? It’s time for disclosure to the people affected.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS