March 12, 2014
3:41 pm EDT
Many schools are stuck on a “treadmill” of never-ending pesticide applications, without addressing the underlying issues that make schools attractive to pests. If we can make it so pests aren’t attracted in the first place, the need for pesticides in schools would be greatly reduced.
Choosing a smart, sensible, and sustainable approach can reduce pests and pesticide risks, create a healthier environment for our children, and save schools money in pesticide treatment and energy costs from improved insulation as a result of sealing cracks and adding door sweeps. We call this approach Integrated Pest Management (IPM).
In January, I traveled to Louisiana to learn about the success of an EPA grant to bring this healthier, more sustainable approach to the 40,000 children in Orleans Parish. I visited John McDonogh High School and witnessed first-hand how it was transformed by Integrated Pest Management.
The presence of rats and other pests can become a plague on a school; John McDonogh High was a case-in-point. However, through strong school leadership and technical support for IPM, John McDonogh High was transformed into a healthier environment for children, and was no longer known for its pest problem.
Simple preventive measures like sealing cracks and openings, installing door sweeps, fixing water leaks, and keeping food in sealed containers can make a school unappealing to pests. Where preventive measures are not sufficient to eliminate pests, the judicious and careful use of pesticides can complete your school’s pest control strategy.
Here’s what we’re doing to get more schools off the “pest control treadmill.” Today, we are announcing 3 new grants to promote School Integrated Pest Management nation-wide to help more schools adopt a smart, sensible, and sustainable approach to addressing pests:
- The Texas A&M Agrilife Extension project will develop a central, internet-based hub for materials and phone apps so more school districts across the country will have the information and tools they need to adopt an IPM program.
- The University of Arizona will pilot a training and certification program for school staff (custodians, kitchen staff, and school administrators) in eight states and four tribes, partnering with five other universities and stakeholders. Once finalized, the training materials will be available free to schools nationwide.
- The Michigan State University project will directly assist 5% of Michigan and Indiana schools to adopt IPM through hands-on education, web-based training and coalition-building. Roughly 135,000 children may benefit.
What are your ideas to get more schools off the “pest control treadmill?” How can we bring successful models to more of the 15,000 school districts across the country? Please email your ideas to email@example.com.
Jim Jones is the Assistant Administrator of the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. He is responsible for managing the office which implements the nation’s pesticide, toxic chemical, and pollution prevention laws. Jim’s career with EPA spans more than 26 years. He has an M.A. from the University of California at Santa Barbara and a B.A. from the University of Maryland, both in Economics.
Editor's Note: The views expressed here are intended to explain EPA policy. They do not change anyone's rights or obligations.
Please share this post. However, please don't change the title or the content. If you do make changes, don't attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.