Skip to content

Comment Policy

We encourage you to share your thoughts as they relate to the topic being discussed. We review and post comments according to the policy below. The views expressed in comments reflect those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or the federal government.

We want to publish your comments, but we expect comments generally to be courteous. To that end, we have established the following policy.

We reserve the discretion not to post comments that:

  • contain obscene, indecent, or profane language;
  • contain threats or defamatory statements;
  • contain hate speech directed at race, color, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, ethnicity, age, religion, or disability; or
  • promote or endorse services or products. (Note that non-commercial links that are relevant to the topic or another comment are acceptable.)

Do not submit copyrighted or other proprietary material in any form unless you clearly indicate that you have permission to do so. By posting your comments or other work, you grant EPA and anyone viewing the EPA Web site irrevocable permission to copy, distribute, make derivatives, display or perform the commenter’s work publicly and free-of-charge.

If you are a reporter, please send questions to the EPA Newsroom through normal channels rather than by submitting questions here as comments.

We recognize that the Internet is a 24/7 medium and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, we intend to review and post comments from 8:30 am – 5:30 pm Monday through Friday except for on federal holidays. We intend to review and post comments submitted at other times as soon as possible on the next business day.

In some cases we ask you to provide your name and e-mail address, although providing either is optional. We request your name to make it easier to carry on a conversation. For this reason, we publish your name along with your comment. We ask for your e-mail address so that we can contact you if necessary. It is our policy not to publish your e-mail address.

To protect your privacy, please do not include information (e.g., an e-mail address or phone number) in the text of your comment that identifies you.

You can find additional guidance as to how EPA regards privacy issues within the privacy policy provided on EPA’s main Web site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.

If you have questions about this comment policy or how we apply it, please contact us.

3 Responses leave one →
  1. Gudrun Scott RN permalink
    November 3, 2012

    if the toilet does not function, bowel movements can be stored in those ubiquidous plastic bags drapped over a wastebasket which every household has a bundle of. It can be tied and double bagged as needed and stored in a larger garbage bag for evntual pick-up. This prevents some odors and containment of sanitary pollution. This should be talked about openly and should have been discussed at this blog of the EPA. I personally did double bagging and burning of the garbage rurally a couple of years ago when burn barrels were permitted but now no longer and one would have to dispose of the larger garbage bag at the local alpiss of ueas a way to copy with a sanitary issue. uproblem.se I landfill or transfer station. At any rate it needs to be discussed and are there any other better ideas and what about disposal of urine? Any ideas out there other than just diluting the urine with rain water? I have also worked as a forest lookout one summer and we used an outdoor toilet with some lye sprinkled on the excrement – maybe a large plastic bucket can be designated as a toilet- one for each floor?

  2. Vincent Pawlowski permalink
    April 22, 2013

    This is the best this blog can do for Earth Day?
    Happy 29th year anniversary, EPA!
    All I have to comment on is a half year old comment about bagging poop?

  3. Bradley S. Hayes permalink
    June 6, 2013

    I am sorry to say but Blacks are usually victims of Environmental problems in inner cities, Black leaf in Louisville KY is perfect example, Ashland KY shows that there is no racism in these toxic chemicals, there they poison Blacks and Whites together. We walk together in this nation, but the middle class are beat down, how could we ever be on equal footing with these companies, they sure do give a lot more money to Senators, Congress, while the middle class need to concentrate on putting food on there families table. Healthcare.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS