ticks

The New Graphic will do for Insect Repellents What SPF Labeling did for Sunscreens

Remember the days before SPF when you weren’t so sure how long your sun screen would protect you from the sun’s harmful rays? Maybe I’m dating myself. I burn easily and had no idea how to protect myself, what to apply, and when to reapply suntan lotion.

Many of us continue to experience the same problems when trying to decide which mosquito repellent to use and when to reapply it. And what about ticks?

Nowadays we know that both mosquitoes and ticks carry some serious diseases. Mosquitoes can give you West Nile virus and St. Louis encephalitis, and ticks can transmit serious diseases like Lyme disease and Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Like sunscreens, mosquito and tick repellents can provide important protection against potentially lifelong health problems.

More

Editor's Note: The views expressed here are intended to explain EPA policy. They do not change anyone's rights or obligations.

Please share this post. However, please don't change the title or the content. If you do make changes, don't attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.

Springtime Means Tick Time

I remember my distress when both of my children came home from camp one year with ticks. I know from friends and colleagues who have contracted diseases carried by ticks, such as Lyme disease, that Lyme disease can be a life-changing, harrowing experience — from fevers to joint-pain and numbness to worsening symptoms. Luckily, my own children were spared.

Ticks are a growing problem across much of the nation. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, preliminary results from three different evaluation methods suggest that the number of people diagnosed with Lyme disease each year in the United States is around 300,000. With warmer weather upon us, we’re all gearing up for more time in the great outdoors.
More

Editor's Note: The views expressed here are intended to explain EPA policy. They do not change anyone's rights or obligations.

Please share this post. However, please don't change the title or the content. If you do make changes, don't attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.

Does Buying Insect Repellent Confuse You, Too?

By Emily Selia

Photo by Kayhi Han

Photo by Kayhi Han

September was always my favorite month in the Washington, D.C. area.  The days were still long and good for evening walks in the woods or kayaking on the river. But those evenings also meant braving a veritable swarm of mosquitoes that somehow seemed to find me more than anyone else in my family. And, a growing number of ticks seemed to be appearing along my favorite hiking paths, latching onto my clothes.

When I’m outside where I might be bitten, I try to use insect repellent to keep ticks and mosquitos away. I hate the annoying itch from mosquitos and I know that both ticks and mosquitos can transmit diseases through their bites.

Here’s the challenge – When I’m in a hurry shopping for an insect repellent, it’s hard to quickly pick one – there are so many different bottles on the shelf!

I want to know – how long will a product work? Does it work on mosquitos or ticks? I don’t want to use the wrong one or use it incorrectly. Most of all, I just don’t want to be bitten so much!

I know I could read the label to tell which product is best for me.  The thing is, the print can be tiny, and sometimes it’s hard to find the information I need quickly.

Good news! My colleagues at EPA are trying to solve this problem.

We’re asking for your thoughts on a proposed graphic to be placed on insect repellent labels that CLEARLY tells you important information so you can choose the right products.  It’s kind of like the SPF symbol on sunscreen that tells you how much UV protection it provides. This proposed new graphic tells you if the insect repellent works for 2, 4, or 6 hours, or even longer. And, it tells you if it works on mosquitos, ticks or both. It’s simple, clear and easy to see. Manufacturers will have the option to put this graphic on qualifying products after EPA scientists make sure the product works for the amount of time they claim.

What do you think of the proposed graphic? Will it help you pick a product?

I think this new graphic will help me quickly pick a repellent that works for me and my activities. And, fewer bites means the warm evenings of September will probably be my favorite times next year, too.

About the author: Emily Selia is an Environmental Health Scientist at the EPA Office of Pesticide Programs. She primarily works on health communication and outreach, including farm worker health programs.

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed here are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

Please share this post. However, please don't change the title or the content. If you do make changes, don't attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.

Even in Winter

Several links below exit EPA Exit EPA Disclaimer

By Lina Younes

Recently, my youngest daughter went to Great Falls Park, VA with her fifth grade science class. Since the weather forecast called for a cold day, the teacher recommended that the children bundle up in several layers of clothing to fully enjoy their time outdoors. As part of the field trip preparations, the teacher also warned the children about the possibility of ticks in the park. She suggested using insect repellents safely.

Personally, I was puzzled. I didn’t think that ticks and other insects could survive cold temperatures. I always associated bugs like ticks and mosquitoes with the summer months. Outdoor bugs and winter didn’t make sense to me. I asked the experts in our Office of Pesticide Programs for the facts and was even more surprised with the results. Thus, I decided to share the information with you.

How cold does it have to be in order not to risk get bitten by mosquitoes and ticks when you go outside? The answer: Below 4 degrees Celsius (about 39 degrees Fahrenheit) for mosquitoes.

And, how about ticks? “For ticks—they can bite year round. It is less likely below freezing temperatures due to lack of movement, but they can attach if you come in contact with them.”

In my case, I confess, that I will be more vigilant when I hear about outbreaks of tick and mosquito-borne diseases such as lyme disease, West Nile Virus,  and Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, when I go outdoors. And, when traveling to subtropical and tropical areas, such as U.S. territories (Puerto Rico and Guam) we need to be careful with mosquito transmitted diseases, such as dengue fever, too.

Furthermore, do you have pets? Do you take your dog for a walk outside? Make sure your pet doesn’t bring any ticks home with him even during winter. Ask the veterinarian for tick control products that will help prevent ticks from attaching to your pet so everyone can stay healthy.

About the author: Lina Younes has been working for EPA since 2002 and currently serves the Multilingual Outreach and Communications Liaison for EPA. She manages EPA’s social media efforts in Spanish. Prior to joining EPA, she was the Washington bureau chief for two Puerto Rican newspapers and she has worked for several government agencies.

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed here are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

Please share this post. However, please don't change the title or the content. If you do make changes, don't attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.

Be Kind to Ticks, They Could Save Your Life

By Steve DiMattei

Ticks, the mere mention of the word will cause hair to stand up on the back of your neck. These tiny little disease-carrying arachnids crawl on you and bury themselves in your skin. You can try to crush them, even light them on fire, but they are nearly impossible to kill. Most people would just as soon rid the planet of these critters, but I hold them in higher esteem. You see, one of them saved my life.

Back in June of 2011, after several days of rain, grass in neighborhood yards was well above ankle high. We were finding ticks galore in our house. My wife had been treated for Lyme disease two years earlier so our family was trained to be on the lookout for the freeloading blood suckers.

One night in bed, I removed a deformed-looking scab from my leg and immediately reached for a magnifying glass. Those of you over 45 understand the concept of having a magnifying glass at the ready. To my horror I saw the disgusting head of the tick and those tiny legs. The next day I headed to my doctor to be tested for Lyme. The doctor took one look at the tick I brought, prescribed an antibiotic and told me to come back in three weeks.

He also had me take a couple of deep breaths as he listened to my heart. It was then that he asked what was going on with my heart murmur. ”Nothing,” I replied, “a minor heart defect I had all my life.” He told me to make an appointment with my cardiologist immediately.

Within three weeks I went from “Do I have Lyme disease?” to “You have an aortic aneurysm, and need open heart surgery. Now.”

An aortic aneurysm is a bulging in the aorta, and if it is not corrected the aorta will eventually tear or burst. About 15,000 people die from this every year typically because the person is asymptomatic until the aorta tears or bursts. After successful surgery in August, I’m back to work with a better appreciation for life even if the scars on my chest make me look like a Frankenstein wannabe.

As for my new found fondness for ticks, anytime I’m in a quiet room, and every night as I put my head on my pillow, I get a gentle reminder from the mechanical valve in my heart; tick, tick, tick, tick…

About the author: Steve DiMattei works in the Quality Assurance Unit at EPA New England’s Lab, and is an avid golfer.

Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed in Greenversations are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed here are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

Please share this post. However, please don't change the title or the content. If you do make changes, don't attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.

Science Wednesday: Biodiversity and Lyme disease – In the Field

Each week we write about the science behind environmental protection. Previous Science Wednesdays.

Recognizing that there is a need for more scientific studies characterizing the mechanistic pathways linking social stressors (deforestation, habitat fragmentation, climate change), biodiversity, and human disease transmission, EPA developed a Biodiversity and Human Health research initiative to develop and sponsor long-term and pilot research projects.

The Biodiversity and Human Health research projects are the first of their kind at EPA, in subject matter and approach. The approach is interdisciplinary, involving ecologists, public health specialists, social scientists, and earth scientists. One unique part of the studies is that decision-makers are included in the research process, so that new findings of scientific knowledge can quickly be put into practice.

Starting tomorrow, I’ll be making a field site visit to one EPA-sponsored research project.

Rick Ostfeld, of the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies is leading a project entitled “Mechanisms Linking Host Biodiversity to Lyme Disease Risk: An Experimental Approach” to investigate how differences in animal community composition affect Lyme disease transmission in Duchess County, NY.

People get Lyme disease by being bitten by a tick infected with the spirochete bacterium, Borrelia burgdorferi. Ticks acquire the Lyme disease bacterium by feeding on small mammals such as white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) and chipmunks that are already infected.

Not all mammals are equally efficient or competent at transmitting the bacteria to ticks when fed upon. In fact, white-footed mice appear to be the most competent animal host reservoir of Lyme disease in the northeastern U.S. So, the more white-footed mice that are in the forest, the greater chance more ticks will be infected, and the greater chance you have of getting bitten by an infected tick.

In a previous blog, I mentioned that forest destruction and fragmentation in the U.S. have been shown to reduce mammalian species diversity, and to increase populations of the white-footed mouse. Rick and his team will be manipulating the composition of small mammals across a variety of forest plot types to see how high and low levels of mammal diversity may affect Lyme disease infection rates among feeding ticks.

In a seminal paper, Rick and his colleagues proposed the “dilution hypothesis” to help explain how high biodiversity can decrease the risk of Lyme disease transmission. It predicts that infection rates for a specific pathogen (e.g. Lyme disease bacterium) will be lower in highly diverse host communities. Why? The “incompetent” reservoir hosts dilute rates of transmission between vectors (ticks) and competent hosts (white-footed mice). With EPA support, Rick’s team will be collecting and analyzing field data to help characterize the scientific mechanisms that can explain how different levels of biodiversity affect Lyme disease risk.

image of authorFor more information on EPA’s Biodiversity and Human Health activities, see:
http://www.epa.gov/ncer/biodiversity

About the author: Montira Pongsiri, PhD, MPH, is an Environmental Health Scientist in EPA’s Office of the Science Advisor.

NOTE: Tweet! Tweet!
Follow the action from our field trip. We’ll posting updates from EPA’s new research Twitter account: @useparesearch.

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed here are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

Please share this post. However, please don't change the title or the content. If you do make changes, don't attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.

No permita a las plagas arruinar sus actividades al aire libre

A medida que las temperaturas a lo largo del continente estadounidense comienzan a calentar, estamos empezando a planificar más actividades al aire libre o a pensar en nuevas maneras para comunicarnos con la naturaleza. Independientemente de si nos interesan actividades como la jardinería, la natación, el escalamiento, la pesca, o visitas a los parques nacionales, muchas podrían producir unos encuentros cercanos indeseados y poco placenteros. No estoy hablando de pumas, osos, lobos o serpientes. Estoy hablando de criaturas mucho más pequeñas como sabandijas molestosas o insectos voladores. Sí, lo sé. No todos los insectos son malos. De hecho, muchos invertebrados desempeñan un papel favorable para el medio ambiente como en el caso de agentes polinizantes como las abejas y las mariposas, o las mariquitas y lombrices (gusanos de tierra). Estas sabandijas que más me preocupan son aquellas plagas como los mosquitos y las garrapatas que pueden transmitir enfermedades. Esas son las que debemos evitar a como dé lugar, si es posible.

image of birdbath with standing waterDebido a las lluvias copiosas en ciertas áreas de Estados Unidos, podemos anticipar grandes cantidades de mosquitos en áreas urbanas y rurales. El primer consejo para eliminar muchas de estas plagas voladoras con el uso mínimo de sustancias químicas consiste en eliminar su hábitat o sea las áreas donde estos insectos viven y se reproducen alrededor de su hogar. Si usted elimina el agua estancada de los desagües, llantas usadas, juguetes, o cualquier contendor abierto en el cual los mosquitos no pueden reproducirse. Por cierto, los mosquitos no necesitan grandes cantidades de agua para multiplicarse. ¿Sabía usted que sobre 150 mosquitos pueden salir de una cucharada de agua estancada? Si usted tiene baños para aves o pequeñas piscinas para sus hijos, debe cambiar el agua frecuentemente al menos una vez a la semana para evitar que los mosquitos se reproduzcan. Si va a pasar un buen tiempo al aire libre, use repelentes de mosquitos registrados por la Agencia de Protección Ambiental (EPA, por sus siglas en inglés) cuando sea necesario. Sobre todo, lea la etiqueta y siga las instrucciones al pie de la letra. Si hay advertencias de brotes de enfermedades transmitidas por mosquitos en su área, tales como el virus del Nilo Occidental, consulte con su estado o departamento de salud local para más información sobre medidas de control de mosquitos que se hayan implementado en el área donde vive.

Cuando vaya a disfruta de actividades al aire libre, hay otras plagas como las garrapatas que también transmiten enfermedades como la de Lyme, por ejemplo. Si va a ir a un bosque o entrar en áreas de mucho pasto, debe usar ropa adecuada como pantalones y camisas de manga larga. Los repelentes son eficaces también. Por lo tanto, no deje que las plagas arruinen sus vacaciones o sus ratos de ocio al aire libre.

Sobre la autor: Lina M. F. Younes ha trabajado en la EPA desde el 2002 y está a cargo del Grupo de Trabajo sobre Comunicaciones Multilingües. Como periodista, dirigió la oficina en Washington de dos periódicos puertorriqueños y ha laborado en varias agencias gubernamentales.

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed here are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

Please share this post. However, please don't change the title or the content. If you do make changes, don't attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.

Biodiversity and Human Disease – How EPA is Studying the Connections

Each week we write about the science behind environmental protection. Previous Science Wednesdays.

About the author: Montira Pongsiri, PhD, MPH, is an Environmental Health Scientist in EPA’s Office of the Science Advisor.

I was first associated with EPA as a STAR Fellow studying the risks and tradeoffs of using pesticides to control infectious diseases. Today, I’m an EPA scientist focusing on infectious diseases in the wider framework of ecosystem services, the direct and indirect benefits people derive from ecosystems.

The primary questions I am helping EPA explore are: What is the underlying mechanism of disease emergence, and do changes in biodiversity play a role?

Our research projects are unique in their interdisciplinary approach, involving ecologists, public health specialists, social scientists, and earth scientists, and also by including decision-makers early in the process to help ensure that new findings can be used to make better decisions.

photo showing two scientists checking opossum for ticks which are removed and collected to test for the presence of the Lyme Disease bacteriumAt one field site in northwest Connecticut, an opossum is checked for ticks, which are removed and collected to test for the presence of the Lyme disease bacterium, Borrelia burgdorferi.

One area we’re studying is Lyme disease risk (chronicled previously by Melissa Anley-Mills and Aaron Ferster). Research partner Richard Ostfeld of the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies hypothesizes that a greater diversity of native mammal hosts could help decrease the risk of people getting Lyme disease. How? People get Lyme disease through tick bites, and ticks acquire the Lyme disease agent by feeding on mammals such as mice and squirrels. Not all mammals are equally efficient, or “competent,” in transmitting the disease agent to the ticks. So perhaps having a greater diversity of mammalian species, with their varying capabilities of transmitting the pathogen, could “dilute” the rates by which ticks get infected. Lower rates of tick infection equal lower risk of human infection.

There is also a connection between animal diversity and landscape condition. Forest destruction and fragmentation in the U.S. have been shown to reduce mammalian species diversity and to increase populations of the white-footed mouse—the most competent host of Lyme disease.

With the support of a new STAR grant, Ostfeld and his colleagues are testing this hypothesis by manipulating mammalian host communities in forest fragments and studying the effects on pathogen transmission rates.

When we better understand the mechanisms linking biodiversity and human disease through this and other research studies, we may be able to develop environmentally-based and behavioral approaches to both promote conservation as well as to reduce the risk of human disease – a win-win for environment and public health.

In addition to the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, other EPA research partners include the CDC, Yale, NASA Ames, UCLA, the Institute for Bird Populations, Rutgers, and the NJ Department of Environmental Protection.

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed here are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

Please share this post. However, please don't change the title or the content. If you do make changes, don't attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.