<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bring Back The Water Fountain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2012/02/bring-back-the-water-fountain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2012/02/bring-back-the-water-fountain/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bring-back-the-water-fountain</link>
	<description>EPA&#039;s Blog About Our World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: h2ofilters</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2012/02/bring-back-the-water-fountain/comment-page-1/#comment-52087</link>
		<dc:creator>h2ofilters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=12440#comment-52087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I support public water fountain but some of them are so unsightly that one is afraid of germs from them. I carry filtered water in a stainless steel water bottle, so does everyone in my home. 

Bottled water could cost over $1000 a year for those that depend on it and they may not realize it. That&#039;s the cash that should be in their savings account. But again, public water fountain will be preferred if they are well maintained.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I support public water fountain but some of them are so unsightly that one is afraid of germs from them. I carry filtered water in a stainless steel water bottle, so does everyone in my home. </p>
<p>Bottled water could cost over $1000 a year for those that depend on it and they may not realize it. That&#8217;s the cash that should be in their savings account. But again, public water fountain will be preferred if they are well maintained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2012/02/bring-back-the-water-fountain/comment-page-1/#comment-51819</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=12440#comment-51819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Water is a natural resource that should be available free.  Those who believe bottled water is better are free to make that choice.  My concern is that as public fountains vanish - I have NO choice but to buy bottled water - even though I prefer the good old American tap water]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Water is a natural resource that should be available free.  Those who believe bottled water is better are free to make that choice.  My concern is that as public fountains vanish &#8211; I have NO choice but to buy bottled water &#8211; even though I prefer the good old American tap water</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie g.</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2012/02/bring-back-the-water-fountain/comment-page-1/#comment-48314</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie g.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=12440#comment-48314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I was in Idaho this summer one of the ski resorts had a public fountain that was set up to fill water bottles. Each time a water bottle was filled is had an LED display that said XX number of water bottles had been diverted from area landfills...Loved it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in Idaho this summer one of the ski resorts had a public fountain that was set up to fill water bottles. Each time a water bottle was filled is had an LED display that said XX number of water bottles had been diverted from area landfills&#8230;Loved it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sv</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2012/02/bring-back-the-water-fountain/comment-page-1/#comment-48231</link>
		<dc:creator>sv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=12440#comment-48231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am really glad to see this post from Nancy Stoner from the EPA’s Office of Water. Thank you Nancy, much appreciated.

Sheri&#039;s concern for safe water would be necessary, if she is in one of those countries where tap water is not free of contaminants and living organisms. But U.S. is not one of those countries, (not yet at least). 
 
However, if more number of people opt out of public water system and go for bottled water, there will be less rationale for investing public money in better water purification and water distribution systems, and less demand from the public for better performance and accountability from the water providers. Both of these can lead to a situation where people will be forced to depend on cleaning their own water, as sheri does. A real danger as our water systems as really old.
 
Incidentally Sheri, you are better off cleaning your own water than depending on bottled water. The tap water in the US is better regulated (with each consumer receiving regular score cards on the quality of water),  while bottled water is not as well regulated.

The only thing that goes in favor of bottled water is convenience: of buying when you need water, and throwing the bottle away. When you walk for hours without finding a public source for water, it is indeed tempting to buy a bottle of water, if you do not have your own water. But public water taps at regular intervals with a spout that is suitable for filling a reusable container could easily solve this problem of convenience. Thus my appreciation for this blog. (Now you see why people in Minneapolis supported this).

However for many individuals personal convenience comes before civic responsibility (eg: not spitting or urinating in public place, not using/ throwing plastic bottles away on a regular basis), and this blog will not make a difference to thos people. 

But for others worried about the safety about public water, coming  from an EPA employee, this blog should provide reassurance about the quality of water we get from our public water systems. Or may be Nancy or someone else from EPA could write another blog about the different types of regulations in place for ensuring the safety of tap water vs. bottled water. It could also include a note on the quality that public water systems in the U.S. strive to maintain.

One last point to support @chs: whether public or private, wasting water, especially such as in the form of constantly running water fountains that loses a lot of water to evaporation (even when it is in the form of public art or it is in the lobby of a corporate building) is a crime given the amount of resources, including energy that goes for purifying it. Such practices should be discouraged, by withholding permits, except for having it run as a closed looped system, or to be run only when the temperature of the atmosphere is same as that of water, thus reducing water loss to evaporation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really glad to see this post from Nancy Stoner from the EPA’s Office of Water. Thank you Nancy, much appreciated.</p>
<p>Sheri&#8217;s concern for safe water would be necessary, if she is in one of those countries where tap water is not free of contaminants and living organisms. But U.S. is not one of those countries, (not yet at least). </p>
<p>However, if more number of people opt out of public water system and go for bottled water, there will be less rationale for investing public money in better water purification and water distribution systems, and less demand from the public for better performance and accountability from the water providers. Both of these can lead to a situation where people will be forced to depend on cleaning their own water, as sheri does. A real danger as our water systems as really old.</p>
<p>Incidentally Sheri, you are better off cleaning your own water than depending on bottled water. The tap water in the US is better regulated (with each consumer receiving regular score cards on the quality of water),  while bottled water is not as well regulated.</p>
<p>The only thing that goes in favor of bottled water is convenience: of buying when you need water, and throwing the bottle away. When you walk for hours without finding a public source for water, it is indeed tempting to buy a bottle of water, if you do not have your own water. But public water taps at regular intervals with a spout that is suitable for filling a reusable container could easily solve this problem of convenience. Thus my appreciation for this blog. (Now you see why people in Minneapolis supported this).</p>
<p>However for many individuals personal convenience comes before civic responsibility (eg: not spitting or urinating in public place, not using/ throwing plastic bottles away on a regular basis), and this blog will not make a difference to thos people. </p>
<p>But for others worried about the safety about public water, coming  from an EPA employee, this blog should provide reassurance about the quality of water we get from our public water systems. Or may be Nancy or someone else from EPA could write another blog about the different types of regulations in place for ensuring the safety of tap water vs. bottled water. It could also include a note on the quality that public water systems in the U.S. strive to maintain.</p>
<p>One last point to support @chs: whether public or private, wasting water, especially such as in the form of constantly running water fountains that loses a lot of water to evaporation (even when it is in the form of public art or it is in the lobby of a corporate building) is a crime given the amount of resources, including energy that goes for purifying it. Such practices should be discouraged, by withholding permits, except for having it run as a closed looped system, or to be run only when the temperature of the atmosphere is same as that of water, thus reducing water loss to evaporation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivian Spencer</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2012/02/bring-back-the-water-fountain/comment-page-1/#comment-48224</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivian Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=12440#comment-48224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I agree with the article, bottled water also has severe environmental implications.  &quot;Water Folllies&quot; by Robert Glennon contains several cases where the pumping of &quot;spring&quot; groundwater for bottled water has resulted in the devastation of rivers, streams and aquatic life, resulting in limited oppportunities for sport fishing.  Bottled water generates more profits than automobiles or oil.  Localities often allow bottling companies to come in to create employment and generate economic development.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I agree with the article, bottled water also has severe environmental implications.  &#8220;Water Folllies&#8221; by Robert Glennon contains several cases where the pumping of &#8220;spring&#8221; groundwater for bottled water has resulted in the devastation of rivers, streams and aquatic life, resulting in limited oppportunities for sport fishing.  Bottled water generates more profits than automobiles or oil.  Localities often allow bottling companies to come in to create employment and generate economic development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chs</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2012/02/bring-back-the-water-fountain/comment-page-1/#comment-47777</link>
		<dc:creator>chs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=12440#comment-47777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m all for public drinking fountains, especially ones with a design (tap) where you can easily fill a reusable water bottle as well. But what about the ones like in Portland, Oregon, that run constantly? Isn&#039;t that a waste of water?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for public drinking fountains, especially ones with a design (tap) where you can easily fill a reusable water bottle as well. But what about the ones like in Portland, Oregon, that run constantly? Isn&#8217;t that a waste of water?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gautam Patel</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2012/02/bring-back-the-water-fountain/comment-page-1/#comment-47641</link>
		<dc:creator>Gautam Patel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=12440#comment-47641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hear ,it is not question of water or soda.How one can takeon  soda 
over water.water is water and soda is soda.Botteled water ruined our environment impliedly not only that but it has destroyed our immunity to different dieses.And as whole 90%people have no bother for tap water if it save a &#039;even&#039;little to our enviornment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear ,it is not question of water or soda.How one can takeon  soda<br />
over water.water is water and soda is soda.Botteled water ruined our environment impliedly not only that but it has destroyed our immunity to different dieses.And as whole 90%people have no bother for tap water if it save a &#8216;even&#8217;little to our enviornment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berkwarner</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2012/02/bring-back-the-water-fountain/comment-page-1/#comment-47540</link>
		<dc:creator>Berkwarner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=12440#comment-47540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I live in a place where you can (and I do) still drink from the streams. Can you imagine? Mmmmm, good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in a place where you can (and I do) still drink from the streams. Can you imagine? Mmmmm, good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2012/02/bring-back-the-water-fountain/comment-page-1/#comment-47535</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=12440#comment-47535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@vickie: I agree with you and the article that cities and towns should bring back the bubblers, I&#039;d just like to point out that while accessing water at these points may be &quot;free&quot; for the user, to collect, treat and pump it costs the utility a lot of money.  
We should all value tap water more than we do.  People in the developing world surely do.  Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@vickie: I agree with you and the article that cities and towns should bring back the bubblers, I&#8217;d just like to point out that while accessing water at these points may be &#8220;free&#8221; for the user, to collect, treat and pump it costs the utility a lot of money.<br />
We should all value tap water more than we do.  People in the developing world surely do.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheri</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2012/02/bring-back-the-water-fountain/comment-page-1/#comment-47534</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=12440#comment-47534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm, tap water.  Most of the time it contains pharmaceuticals and hormones, which are not required to be removed by federal law.  Bottled water manufacturers may use tap water in their processes, but usually it goes through additional treatment that does not take place at the local water treatment plant. If youv&#039;e ever been around a distribution system when they are cleaning their lines and appurtenances you&#039;d gag if you saw the &#039;crap&#039; in tap water. We are fortunate at my house to &#039;treat&#039; the incoming municipal water, it passes through an active carbon filter and drinking/cooking water goes through reverse osmosis treatment.  I take it with me when I travel or leave the house. This is for my health and in the process I don&#039;t have to buy bottled water very often. 

But, I am tired of all the disingenuous rhetoric about bottled water. Bottled water is a hundred times better than health damaging soda pop that people consume in mass quantities - which comes packaged in plastic.  Why isn&#039;t someone harping about that?  I&#039;ll take bottled water over tap water anyday thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, tap water.  Most of the time it contains pharmaceuticals and hormones, which are not required to be removed by federal law.  Bottled water manufacturers may use tap water in their processes, but usually it goes through additional treatment that does not take place at the local water treatment plant. If youv&#8217;e ever been around a distribution system when they are cleaning their lines and appurtenances you&#8217;d gag if you saw the &#8216;crap&#8217; in tap water. We are fortunate at my house to &#8216;treat&#8217; the incoming municipal water, it passes through an active carbon filter and drinking/cooking water goes through reverse osmosis treatment.  I take it with me when I travel or leave the house. This is for my health and in the process I don&#8217;t have to buy bottled water very often. </p>
<p>But, I am tired of all the disingenuous rhetoric about bottled water. Bottled water is a hundred times better than health damaging soda pop that people consume in mass quantities &#8211; which comes packaged in plastic.  Why isn&#8217;t someone harping about that?  I&#8217;ll take bottled water over tap water anyday thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
