Skip to content

Science Wednesday: Net Zero

2011 November 30

Each week we write about the science behind environmental protection. Previous Science Wednesdays.

By Leslie Gillespie-Marthaler

As someone who has spent time on military installations and has a great respect for the Army community, I’m thrilled to be helping the Army work toward “Net Zero” and sustainability.

I’ve lived on installations myself, and know firsthand that they are very much like small cities. With thousands of soldiers, civilians and families on base, they face many of the same challenges that cities around the country are facing, including increased energy costs, limited water resources and aging infrastructure. For example, last year Army installations used 41.8 billion gallons of potable water at a cost of $67.4 million.

To help combat these challenges, EPA and the Department of the Army have signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to advance the Army’s Net Zero Initiative.

The goal of the Initiative is to ensure that Army installations only consume as much energy and water as they produce and minimize waste sent to landfills. EPA scientists and engineers will provide their skills and expertise to bring cutting-edge research assistance to the effort.

I was happy to be on hand this week when Paul Anastas, PhD, Assistant Administrator for the Office of Research and Development and Science Advisor at EPA, signed the MOU with the Honorable Katherine Hammack, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy and the Environment.

“The Net Zero partnership was inspired by the Army’s ability to demonstrate true leadership in sustainability,” said Anastas. “The Army Installations are a test bed for new technologies that can solve more than one problem and can be replicated or scaled for communities throughout the nation.”

“We look forward to working with Army experts to develop tools and technologies to address some of our more pressing economic and environmental challenges,” he added.

“Through a whole-of-government approach to sustainability, the Army’s Net Zero Initiative increases the Army’s ability to be successful today and into the future. Our collaboration with EPA’s Office of Research and Development brings leading-edge research assistance together to advance both our institutions’ goals for increased resource efficiency and balanced resource use,” said Hammack.

Anastas emphasized how the Army’s and EPA’s goals are intricately interconnected: “You are protecting the nation. We are helping make the nation worth protecting,” he said.

I feel it’s both a privilege and an honor to help incredible Army communities and their neighbors achieve “Net Zero.”

About the author: A graduate of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, Leslie Gillespie-Marthaler, is currently a senior advisor in EPA’s Office of Research and Development.

Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed in Greenversations are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed in Greenversations are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

6 Responses leave one →
  1. Uncle Arman permalink
    November 30, 2011

    The Army’s And EPA’s : Sustainability Guards.-

    Sustainability Approach needs a system that show two forces : hardware (The Army’s) and software (EPA’s). Both of them are interconnected and interdependent against the enemy: anti-command and anti civilian. Those interferences should make antibody of sustainability processing within carry out the nation, as sustainability guards……

  2. Dawn Junkins permalink
    November 30, 2011

    Climate, energy and man-made causes to change.

    I was curious to know if fibers and heat from a live cable line or fiber-optic line that had a surge of energy delivered to an unintended location would cause an off-gassing of VOC’s.

  3. internet marketing belgium permalink
    December 1, 2011

    very nice post i loved it a lot what a nice post to read really awesome

  4. Kiyohisa Tanada permalink
    December 1, 2011

    The military training thinks that simulation is necessary, but,
    Cannot you perform military training of “the energy saving?”
    The U.S. forces need mass energy to dispatch “a battleship”.
    I think so that I am effective in budget deficit reduction of America if I carry out energy saving.

  5. Free Education Aid permalink
    December 2, 2011

    Nice post. I like it most. Thanks for sharing this.

  6. dmxasd12 permalink
    December 24, 2011

    nice post.thank for sharing

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS