<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science Wednesday: Green Chemistry Turns 20</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2011/06/science-wednesday-green-chemistry-turns-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2011/06/science-wednesday-green-chemistry-turns-20/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=science-wednesday-green-chemistry-turns-20</link>
	<description>EPA&#039;s Blog About Our World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:21:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2011/06/science-wednesday-green-chemistry-turns-20/comment-page-1/#comment-41715</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=8412#comment-41715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Refuse to accept funding or assistance from big corporations and green chemistry becomes a viable plan for the future. I&#039;m happy to see articles like this all the same, but know that it won&#039;t make much difference until we remove the financial IV from our arms belonging to corporations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refuse to accept funding or assistance from big corporations and green chemistry becomes a viable plan for the future. I&#8217;m happy to see articles like this all the same, but know that it won&#8217;t make much difference until we remove the financial IV from our arms belonging to corporations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron from EPA</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2011/06/science-wednesday-green-chemistry-turns-20/comment-page-1/#comment-41032</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron from EPA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=8412#comment-41032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the question Charles. The reduction cited refers to the annual average reduction (amount reduced yearly) thanks to the award-winning technologies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the question Charles. The reduction cited refers to the annual average reduction (amount reduced yearly) thanks to the award-winning technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge Gerônimo Hipólito</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2011/06/science-wednesday-green-chemistry-turns-20/comment-page-1/#comment-41030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Gerônimo Hipólito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=8412#comment-41030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Food and water are poisoned by pesticides. Until when?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Food and water are poisoned by pesticides. Until when?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2011/06/science-wednesday-green-chemistry-turns-20/comment-page-1/#comment-41026</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=8412#comment-41026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What?  Where you wrote  &quot;On average, winning technologies have eliminated nearly 200 million pounds of...&quot; etc.  do you mean the average of EACH winning technology?

Average the numbers of ALL the winners doesn&#039;t make any sense, you&#039;d be better off to SUM their total savings, not take an average.  Please explain. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?  Where you wrote  &#8220;On average, winning technologies have eliminated nearly 200 million pounds of&#8230;&#8221; etc.  do you mean the average of EACH winning technology?</p>
<p>Average the numbers of ALL the winners doesn&#8217;t make any sense, you&#8217;d be better off to SUM their total savings, not take an average.  Please explain. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armansyahardanis</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2011/06/science-wednesday-green-chemistry-turns-20/comment-page-1/#comment-41024</link>
		<dc:creator>armansyahardanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=8412#comment-41024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Green Chemistry Impact : Carefully or Carelessly !

Many people know Green Chemistry but part of them don&#039;t know it, depended of their knowledge and places. I was scared to see the people who takes, used and ate something carelessly and sometimes I did its too carefully like astronaut there. Is this indication of poor information to the people on 20 years green chemistry be effective?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Green Chemistry Impact : Carefully or Carelessly !</p>
<p>Many people know Green Chemistry but part of them don&#8217;t know it, depended of their knowledge and places. I was scared to see the people who takes, used and ate something carelessly and sometimes I did its too carefully like astronaut there. Is this indication of poor information to the people on 20 years green chemistry be effective?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
