Skip to content

Science Wednesday: Putting Science into Action for Cleaner Communities

2010 July 28

Each week we write about the science behind environmental protection. Previous Science Wednesdays.

After reading statements like “further research is needed” or “researching is ongoing” in articles about science and the environment, I am often frustrated. If only it were possible to have all the answers at our fingertips. Strong science to inform environmental decisions is crucial, and in the world we live in, it seems like these decisions can’t be made quickly enough. We are all anxious to hear what science has to tell us and what new solutions it may offer.

The EPA Office of Research and Development’s recently-released Land Research Progress Report struck me as a heartening example that not only are scientists working hard to obtain results but that these results are substantial and have already been used for practical outcomes.

Taking a look at the report helped me understand exactly what work is being done and how extensive, multifaceted, and successful the Land Research Program has been. The program is one of twelve interdisciplinary research programs at EPA, and it focuses on cleaning up and revitalizing land contaminated by hazardous waste. Main areas of research include landfills, contaminated sediments, groundwater contamination, and underground storage tanks among others

The report tracks research results and impacts from 2005-2009. For each area of research, it offers a detailed account of exactly where and why changes have been implemented, and what further efforts are underway. Figures given in the report such as, “Over the last five years, ORD scientists have partnered with over 40 landfill managers to transfer technology on alternative landfill covers. This resulted in installation cost savings totaling 200 million dollars,” drive home the idea that science is being turned into action. It also highlights some important innovations, such as the groundwater research program developing a patented technology and applying it to a clean-up site.

While there is, no doubt, a long way to go in cleaning up our communities and managing hazardous waste issues, it is refreshing to see clear evidence that the research being done is having an impact. The long timelines required by scientific research projects can often be frustrating, but reports like this one make the results visible and serve as welcome reminders that progress is being made.

About the Author: Cathryn Courtin is a student at Georgetown University in the Science, Technology, and International Affairs program. She is spending her summer working as a student contractor at EPA’s Office of Research and Development.

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed here are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

Please share this post. However, please don't change the title or the content. If you do make changes, don't attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.

4 Responses leave one →
  1. Abecus permalink
    August 1, 2010

    Watch this great documentary on the world’s most important river

  2. Michael E. Bailey permalink
    August 1, 2010

    This is great information. Its is a Land Research Program and that is crucial for cleaning up toxic waste sites and brown fields. Something like this program, if not this program, looks like will be necessary to clean up the Nitrate contamination in the groundwater and water wells of the San Joaquin Valley. Everyone should have access to fresh and clean drinking water. Best wishes, Michael E. Bailey.

  3. Leo permalink
    August 5, 2010

    The EPA does play a vital role in protecting certain parts of our environment. The more I learn about the departments thinking though.
    The more I realize how backwards their thinking is.
    Here they are complaining about lead and mercury in California’s water ways. Putting a stop on suction dredging. These dredges actually clean the water ways of these pollutants. I use a sluice box in local creeks. Guess what comes out first before the gold comes up. LEAD YOU DUMMIES!

  4. jerome permalink
    October 29, 2010

    there should be more efforts in cleaning up the wastes left. we already know what will happen if we leave it unattended, just like leaving a steak on the barbecue grill without someone watching over it. it will be a total waste of effort if we dont do something about it.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS