<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phase 1 of Hudson River Dredging Nears Completion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/10/phase-1-of-hudson-river-dredging-nears-completion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/10/phase-1-of-hudson-river-dredging-nears-completion/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=phase-1-of-hudson-river-dredging-nears-completion</link>
	<description>EPA&#039;s Blog About Our World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: penny auctions reviews</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/10/phase-1-of-hudson-river-dredging-nears-completion/comment-page-1/#comment-41696</link>
		<dc:creator>penny auctions reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=1137#comment-41696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These eight areas will be the starting point for dredging in phase two of the project.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These eight areas will be the starting point for dredging in phase two of the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penny auctions</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/10/phase-1-of-hudson-river-dredging-nears-completion/comment-page-1/#comment-41586</link>
		<dc:creator>penny auctions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=1137#comment-41586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey,you have posted such a effectful article that it will certainly help me]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey,you have posted such a effectful article that it will certainly help me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penny auctions shopping</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/10/phase-1-of-hudson-river-dredging-nears-completion/comment-page-1/#comment-41585</link>
		<dc:creator>penny auctions shopping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=1137#comment-41585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These eight areas will be the starting point for dredging in phase two of the project.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These eight areas will be the starting point for dredging in phase two of the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/10/phase-1-of-hudson-river-dredging-nears-completion/comment-page-1/#comment-31314</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=1137#comment-31314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow this is informative!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow this is informative!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/10/phase-1-of-hudson-river-dredging-nears-completion/comment-page-1/#comment-30925</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 02:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=1137#comment-30925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Great Lakes to Puget Sound, from the Mississippi River to the Everglades, and from Chesapeake Bay to the Colorado – we can only protect the great waters of America if we safeguard the countless streams that feed them and the millions of acres of wetlands that help keep them clean. Perhaps that is why the Senate EPW committee rejected the spurious arguments of powerful polluters and instead voted to restore protections vital to America’s great waters. As its name indicates, the Clean Water Restoration Act does no more than restore the original scope of the Clean Water Act that our nation adopted some 37 years ago – to protect all the waters of the United States&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.waterdamageout.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Great Lakes to Puget Sound, from the Mississippi River to the Everglades, and from Chesapeake Bay to the Colorado – we can only protect the great waters of America if we safeguard the countless streams that feed them and the millions of acres of wetlands that help keep them clean. Perhaps that is why the Senate EPW committee rejected the spurious arguments of powerful polluters and instead voted to restore protections vital to America’s great waters. As its name indicates, the Clean Water Restoration Act does no more than restore the original scope of the Clean Water Act that our nation adopted some 37 years ago – to protect all the waters of the United States<a href="http://www.waterdamageout.com" rel="nofollow">.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael E. Bailey</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/10/phase-1-of-hudson-river-dredging-nears-completion/comment-page-1/#comment-21711</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael E. Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 07:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=1137#comment-21711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was a huge but very important undertaking.  Few would have attempted such a project but it is one that must be done for a healthy river and healthy communities along it.  There is a special type of dredge that could be built that would dredge out the contaminated sedimant while not allowing contaminated water to go down stream.  It sounds like this type of dredge was not used because there was some concern from locals about contaminated water going down stream from the dredging sites.  There maybe ARRA funds from DOT to build one of the special dredges and have it ready to go by 2011.  In the process it would also put shipyard workers to work. But cleaning the Hudson has been and will be important work.  Best wishes, Michael E. Bailey.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a huge but very important undertaking.  Few would have attempted such a project but it is one that must be done for a healthy river and healthy communities along it.  There is a special type of dredge that could be built that would dredge out the contaminated sedimant while not allowing contaminated water to go down stream.  It sounds like this type of dredge was not used because there was some concern from locals about contaminated water going down stream from the dredging sites.  There maybe ARRA funds from DOT to build one of the special dredges and have it ready to go by 2011.  In the process it would also put shipyard workers to work. But cleaning the Hudson has been and will be important work.  Best wishes, Michael E. Bailey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
