Skip to content

Science Wednesday: Risk Assessment In Every Day Life

2009 September 23

Each week we write about the science behind environmental protection. Previous Science Wednesdays.

Whenever someone in my office says, “You’d be the perfect person for…,” my first thought is always this can’t be good. But when the “perfect” assignment was an invitation to teach 7th and 8th grade scientists attending the Summer Educational Development Program about what my colleagues and I do at EPA’s National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA), I immediately agreed.

My next thought, however, was “how do I make Human Health Risk Assessment , interesting to 12- and 13 year-olds?” Yikes!

I decided to start the conversation about risks the students might face in every day life. Things like traffic and playing sports on hard asphalt. Or sharks. We went from there to discuss how one might reduce these every day risks, or “risk management” in the form of using crosswalks or the help of crossing guards.

We then talked about how we at EPA use the NAS Risk Assessment paradigm (hazard identification, dose-response analysis, and exposure assessment) to determine chemical risk. I used the shark example to explain the need to consider both “hazard” and “exposure” in risk assessment. While a hungry shark may be a hazard, we all agreed that there’s not much an exposure risk to us in the classroom. (Well at least we hoped not!).

With no sharks to worry about, I moved the discussion to something we here at EPA are more concerned about: lead. In the context of the four-step risk assessment paradigm, we explored the human health risk assessment of lead to describe determining hazards and risk levels that would result from various exposures.

To end, we talked about how genetics might make one population more susceptible to exposure risk than another population. Using a simple experiment on taste, everyone determined if they were a genetic ‘Taster’ or ‘Non-Taster.’ We talked about how if being a ‘Taster’ was a risk, and only three people in the class can ‘Taste,’ than identifying their presence would impact a risk assessment. This helped the students grasp the importance of understanding susceptible populations in risk assessment, and how smaller subpopulations may be impacted by risks not generally seen in the bigger population.

The energy and enthusiasm that the class brought to the discussion, and their quick understanding of the importance of risk assessment made me all the more energized about what I do every day. I am looking forward to my next perfect assignment.

About the author: Dr. Maureen Gwinn is a toxicologist with the National Center for Environmental Assessment in the Effects Identification and Characterization Group where she works in Human Health Risk Assessment. Dr. Gwinn enjoys doing toxicology outreach with students through the Society of Toxicology’s Education Committee.

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed in Greenversations are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

3 Responses leave one →
  1. Voyage.Home.Loans.CA permalink
    September 23, 2009

    Very interesting. GO GREEN!

  2. Michael E. Bailey permalink
    September 24, 2009

    You had a great group of students interested and motivated. They came from states and school districts that still have a commitment to education, including the sciences. In California school budgets have been cut so far that schools are having trouble teaching the basic subjects now. Many teachers and staff have been let go; school libraries and science labs have had to close their doors. While at the University of California and at Cal State, huge budgets cuts were also make and a major protest is being planned in the UC system that will shut the system down for at least a day in protest against those budget cuts. Here it is looking like a good education is something for those who can go to private schools. Best wishes, Michael E. Bailey.

  3. Johnny R. permalink
    September 24, 2009

    When first applying risk assessment to growing human populations and their growing economies, rational minds recoil in horror at the obsessively compulsive, ecocidal behavior.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS