<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exploring The Sea – EPA Monitors Waste Disposal Sites Off The Mid-Atlantic Coast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/09/exploring-the-sea-%E2%80%93-epa-monitors-waste-disposal-sites-off-the-mid-atlantic-coast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/09/exploring-the-sea-%e2%80%93-epa-monitors-waste-disposal-sites-off-the-mid-atlantic-coast/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=exploring-the-sea-%25e2%2580%2593-epa-monitors-waste-disposal-sites-off-the-mid-atlantic-coast</link>
	<description>EPA&#039;s Blog About Our World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Colip</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/09/exploring-the-sea-%e2%80%93-epa-monitors-waste-disposal-sites-off-the-mid-atlantic-coast/comment-page-1/#comment-21630</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Colip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=1122#comment-21630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, both of you seem passionate about preserving the environment. Thank you for the comments.  I’d like to respond to several points you made and explain more about the monitoring mission which EPA conducted at the Mid-Atlantic waste disposal sites and why it is important to the American people that these missions occur and the waste disposal sites be maintained.  

First, the area where the waste disposal sites are not, and have never been “dead zones”, these sites are far enough off the coast to not experience the flux of nutrients from the mainland coast that cause the low dissolved oxygen environments that do not support aquatic life, or “dead zones”.  Different scientific studies are performed to monitor and address the “dead zone” issue.  In fact, there is plenty of aquatic life present around the waste disposal sites, EPA wants to make sure that a common, commercially used fish species hasn’t moved into the area.  If EPA found such fishable species in the area, we would consider halting waste disposal.  In other words, these waste disposal locations were chosen because they were areas that were relatively clear of aquatic life to begin with, not because of pollution from the mainland or waste disposal, but natural phenomena such as the area’s ocean currents, proximity to the Gulf Stream, etc.
 
Monitoring and maintaining these sites is important to the American people because they allow for safe disposal of dredge material and fish waste, without harming ocean aquatic life.  In fact, only material from navigational channels is permitted to be placed in the ocean sites and that is only after the material has gone through a series of tests prior to being placed there. It is not as if any and all waste can be put at these locations, or any other site.  EPA has strict guidelines and regulations for waste disposal and works hard to find the right balance between protecting the environment and human health of the United States, setting an example to the rest of the world on proper environmental stewardship, and encouraging environmentally friendly economic growth.  If you would like more information about the tests we performed, please refer to the joint EPA/Corps Ocean Testing Manual http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/gbook/. Note that both agencies also encourage the beneficial use of dredge material through beach nourishment and coastal buffering to be considered before placing the material in the ocean.  

I hope this clears up any misunderstanding about the waste disposal sites.  Again, thank you for your comments and enthusiastic concern for the environment of our country and planet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, both of you seem passionate about preserving the environment. Thank you for the comments.  I’d like to respond to several points you made and explain more about the monitoring mission which EPA conducted at the Mid-Atlantic waste disposal sites and why it is important to the American people that these missions occur and the waste disposal sites be maintained.  </p>
<p>First, the area where the waste disposal sites are not, and have never been “dead zones”, these sites are far enough off the coast to not experience the flux of nutrients from the mainland coast that cause the low dissolved oxygen environments that do not support aquatic life, or “dead zones”.  Different scientific studies are performed to monitor and address the “dead zone” issue.  In fact, there is plenty of aquatic life present around the waste disposal sites, EPA wants to make sure that a common, commercially used fish species hasn’t moved into the area.  If EPA found such fishable species in the area, we would consider halting waste disposal.  In other words, these waste disposal locations were chosen because they were areas that were relatively clear of aquatic life to begin with, not because of pollution from the mainland or waste disposal, but natural phenomena such as the area’s ocean currents, proximity to the Gulf Stream, etc.</p>
<p>Monitoring and maintaining these sites is important to the American people because they allow for safe disposal of dredge material and fish waste, without harming ocean aquatic life.  In fact, only material from navigational channels is permitted to be placed in the ocean sites and that is only after the material has gone through a series of tests prior to being placed there. It is not as if any and all waste can be put at these locations, or any other site.  EPA has strict guidelines and regulations for waste disposal and works hard to find the right balance between protecting the environment and human health of the United States, setting an example to the rest of the world on proper environmental stewardship, and encouraging environmentally friendly economic growth.  If you would like more information about the tests we performed, please refer to the joint EPA/Corps Ocean Testing Manual <a href="http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/gbook/" rel="nofollow">http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/gbook/</a>. Note that both agencies also encourage the beneficial use of dredge material through beach nourishment and coastal buffering to be considered before placing the material in the ocean.  </p>
<p>I hope this clears up any misunderstanding about the waste disposal sites.  Again, thank you for your comments and enthusiastic concern for the environment of our country and planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny R.</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/09/exploring-the-sea-%e2%80%93-epa-monitors-waste-disposal-sites-off-the-mid-atlantic-coast/comment-page-1/#comment-21609</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=1122#comment-21609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because the President has pledged to &quot;get this economy back on track growing again&quot;. But a growing economy requires a growing population that inevitably produces more tons of sewage and trash every year, and you  and everyone else demand ever more personal wealth and social services , never minding how the slowly shrinking Earth can possibly absorb all the growing tons of our waste and garbage. It&#039;s a bad habit that will kill us all unless we stop and think about what we are doing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the President has pledged to &#8220;get this economy back on track growing again&#8221;. But a growing economy requires a growing population that inevitably produces more tons of sewage and trash every year, and you  and everyone else demand ever more personal wealth and social services , never minding how the slowly shrinking Earth can possibly absorb all the growing tons of our waste and garbage. It&#8217;s a bad habit that will kill us all unless we stop and think about what we are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gods Sentinel</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/09/exploring-the-sea-%e2%80%93-epa-monitors-waste-disposal-sites-off-the-mid-atlantic-coast/comment-page-1/#comment-21581</link>
		<dc:creator>Gods Sentinel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 05:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=1122#comment-21581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Johnny R....you are so right!  The EPA is not getting paid so they can have a &quot;memorable experience&quot;, they are doing this &quot;job&quot; to help us humans and the ENVIRONMENT!  Why are the tax payers not getting the true feedback?  Who&#039;s in charge down there anyway?  Why isn&#039;t the SOB fired?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnny R&#8230;.you are so right!  The EPA is not getting paid so they can have a &#8220;memorable experience&#8221;, they are doing this &#8220;job&#8221; to help us humans and the ENVIRONMENT!  Why are the tax payers not getting the true feedback?  Who&#8217;s in charge down there anyway?  Why isn&#8217;t the SOB fired?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny R.</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/09/exploring-the-sea-%e2%80%93-epa-monitors-waste-disposal-sites-off-the-mid-atlantic-coast/comment-page-1/#comment-21554</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=1122#comment-21554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a classic example of bureaucratic double-speak, because it presents an on-going environmental atrocity as a normal, legally sanctioned procedure. The fact that the growing human population must add more sludge every year is ignored because an ecocidal future would become too obvious and 100% recycling unavoidable.  Saner citizens refer to such areas as &quot;dead zones&quot; because there are &quot;no commercially useful fish present&quot; for the obvious reason they can&#039;t survive in such pollution and the fish that are present are unsafe to eat. But perhaps we should be hopeful that overfishing has so depleted  Eastern coastal waters that less &quot;fish waste&quot; may be dumped (!) But the growing human population and its growing sewage and garbage problem will soon make up for it, no doubt!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a classic example of bureaucratic double-speak, because it presents an on-going environmental atrocity as a normal, legally sanctioned procedure. The fact that the growing human population must add more sludge every year is ignored because an ecocidal future would become too obvious and 100% recycling unavoidable.  Saner citizens refer to such areas as &#8220;dead zones&#8221; because there are &#8220;no commercially useful fish present&#8221; for the obvious reason they can&#8217;t survive in such pollution and the fish that are present are unsafe to eat. But perhaps we should be hopeful that overfishing has so depleted  Eastern coastal waters that less &#8220;fish waste&#8221; may be dumped (!) But the growing human population and its growing sewage and garbage problem will soon make up for it, no doubt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
