<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dredging Challenges Contribute to Spikes in Air and Water Monitoring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/08/dredging-challenges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/08/dredging-challenges/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dredging-challenges</link>
	<description>EPA&#039;s Blog About Our World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skopeck</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/08/dredging-challenges/comment-page-1/#comment-18610</link>
		<dc:creator>Skopeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=1023#comment-18610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Mr.  Smalley,

The sediment is being taken to a landfill operated by Waste Control Specialists LLC (WCS). It is a 1,338-acre hazardous and radioactive waste processing and disposal facility west of Andrews, Texas, next to the New Mexico border. There, the waste is deposited into cells buried in the ground (surrounded by clay). The facility is permitted under the Toxic Substances Control Act to accept PCB-containing waste.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mr.  Smalley,</p>
<p>The sediment is being taken to a landfill operated by Waste Control Specialists LLC (WCS). It is a 1,338-acre hazardous and radioactive waste processing and disposal facility west of Andrews, Texas, next to the New Mexico border. There, the waste is deposited into cells buried in the ground (surrounded by clay). The facility is permitted under the Toxic Substances Control Act to accept PCB-containing waste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael E. Bailey</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/08/dredging-challenges/comment-page-1/#comment-18587</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael E. Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=1023#comment-18587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am glad you are keeping a close eye on the Hudson River PCB operation.  Getting rid of the hazard is important; but the public health is the most important thing of all.  Best wishes, Michael E. Bailey.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad you are keeping a close eye on the Hudson River PCB operation.  Getting rid of the hazard is important; but the public health is the most important thing of all.  Best wishes, Michael E. Bailey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom smalley</title>
		<link>http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/08/dredging-challenges/comment-page-1/#comment-18570</link>
		<dc:creator>tom smalley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=1023#comment-18570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[where in texas is this sludge going to? and is this the same sludge site that rep. conyers wife got in trouble for? seems it could have been disposed in middle of ocean that would dilute it to MILLIONS of parts of ocean sea water  per granule of contaminites?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where in texas is this sludge going to? and is this the same sludge site that rep. conyers wife got in trouble for? seems it could have been disposed in middle of ocean that would dilute it to MILLIONS of parts of ocean sea water  per granule of contaminites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
