Comments on: An Historic Day for the Hudson http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/05/an-historic-day-for-the-hudson/ The EPA Blog Tue, 30 Jun 2015 06:52:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.1 By: Anonymous http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/05/an-historic-day-for-the-hudson/#comment-13462 Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:04:38 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=881#comment-13462 Another year has passed, and hundreds more died of cancer in my hometown. You are not doing enough.

]]>
By: Chicago Web Design http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/05/an-historic-day-for-the-hudson/#comment-13461 Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:51:55 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=881#comment-13461 I think an achievement can be done through helping each other tasks.

]]>
By: karen http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/05/an-historic-day-for-the-hudson/#comment-13460 Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:57:13 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=881#comment-13460 A year has passed…what has been accomplished?

]]>
By: karen http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/05/an-historic-day-for-the-hudson/#comment-13459 Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:56:04 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=881#comment-13459 A year has passed…what has been achieved in cleaning up the PCBs?

]]>
By: karen http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/05/an-historic-day-for-the-hudson/#comment-13458 Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:05:33 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=881#comment-13458 Do you have target dates and objectives set up?

]]>
By: irvine http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/05/an-historic-day-for-the-hudson/#comment-13457 Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:57:07 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=881#comment-13457 wow, earth surgery!

]]>
By: Skopeck http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/05/an-historic-day-for-the-hudson/#comment-13456 Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:30:50 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=881#comment-13456 Hi Karen, I’m not aware of any current environmental cleanup projects involving the Mohawk. However, my expertise focuses on the Hudson River PCBs cleanup.

]]>
By: karen http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/05/an-historic-day-for-the-hudson/#comment-13455 Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:03:39 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=881#comment-13455 Is anything being done for the Mohawk River, specifically around the old GE site at Schenectady?

]]>
By: Skopeck http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/05/an-historic-day-for-the-hudson/#comment-13454 Tue, 26 May 2009 12:21:34 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=881#comment-13454 Mkolian~ You are correct…. there far field (downstream of dredging) monitors that are collecting information on PCB resuspension. There are near field (positioned around each dredge operation) monitors that are collecting “real time” data info on things like turbidity, total suspended solids, and disolved oxygen. There are no booms set up to capture suspended solids. There is a website (www.hudsondredgingdata.com) that gives a rundown of all the various monitoring going on…and the results.

]]>
By: Mkolian http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2009/05/an-historic-day-for-the-hudson/#comment-13453 Fri, 22 May 2009 20:42:32 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=881#comment-13453 What a task. Amazing it has been 30 years. Puget Sound has a similiar issue with Boeing and PCBs (yet to be resolved). Regarding the implications with disturbing the sediment, I assume there is downstream water quality monitoring (chemistry and biological) to determine the effects of this project. Are there booms set up to capture suspended solids and other particles?

]]>