Skip to content

Science Wednesday: “First Date” on New Technologies

2008 December 24

About the author: Mary Wigginton is an Environmental Protection Specialist in EPA’s Office of Research and Development. She recently attended an all-day public meeting of the EPA-Venture Capital Community Summit.

Attending the EPA-Venture Capital Summit last month was a little like watching two people on a first date.  Pleasantries were exchanged and the summit participants on each side of the table – EPA and venture capitalists – explained how they worked. Each side listened politely and then as the day progressed, you could see them becoming more interested and aware of a possible connection that might be worth pursuing.

The venture capitalists illustrated the value of their businesses for the U.S. economy in two charts describing the percentage of gross domestic product and the number of jobs that venture capital contributes.  These charts show that venture capital has contributed approximately 0.02% of total invested dollars, but in 2006 generated $2.3 trillion in revenue and 10.4 million jobs.  While the venture capitalists acknowledged current economic challenges, they continue to look for new opportunities to invest in innovative environmental technologies.

Rob Brenner, from EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation, co-hosted the summit.  He started off EPA’s introductions by explaining how technology development has been important for EPA through the years.

“The times when we’ve been able to make progress on environmental protection have been when there’s technology available that we can employ as part of our rulemaking process or as part of our voluntary programs,” he said.  As an example, think back on how regulations and catalytic converters on cars improved our air quality.

Mr. Brenner went on to say that the environmental challenges we’re now facing are as much, or more, technology-dependent than any of the ones we faced in the past.  Because the nation’s infrastructure needs to adapt and change – to climate change, increased energy costs, and continuing pollution issues – we will need many, many new technologies.  But those technologies need to be moved from the development stages to commercialization at a faster rate if they are going to have an impact on these challenges.  The venture capital community could help.

At the end of the summit, both sides had a new appreciation for what the other could do to make a difference in the future.  Though not a real “first date,” the summit was a good start. And perhaps these groups could continue working together with states, other federal agencies, and the international community to implement technology solutions to meet our environmental challenges.

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed here are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

Please share this post. However, please don't change the title or the content. If you do make changes, don't attribute the edited title or content to EPA or the author.

4 Responses leave one →
  1. Jamen Mull permalink
    February 12, 2009

    I believe the most important point of this whole discussion is the faster implementation of new technologies into the system. We need to do something about the financial grip that oil companies have on our businesses and government. They have been too influential in repressing new energy source technologies for their own financial gain. And they have deep pockets and strong governmental ties that they use to accomplish this. It must be stopped!

  2. Rob permalink
    March 9, 2009

    There is no reason the private sector and free enterprise shouldn’t be at the forefront of cleaner environmental technology. I’ve always wondered if the two sides consider themselves at competing odds, or is that just a perception?

    At any rate, well-written article. Thanks,


  3. lyounes permalink*
    May 10, 2010

    Thank you for your interest in environmental protection. Sorry we cannot post your comment because it is not directly related to the subject of the blog.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

  1. Jerry

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS