http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2008/07/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=to-blog-or-not-to-blog EPA's Blog About Our World Mon, 20 May 2013 15:03:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2008/07/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-40816 Evi Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:34:29 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=263#comment-40816 this blog is very simple but has PR so high, but I think it’s better to improve it

]]> http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2008/07/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-11881 Jeffrey Levy Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:00:09 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=263#comment-11881 Thanks to everyone above. It’s an interesting time to be leading gov’t web efforts! I think 2009 is going to see some serious use of social media in ways never seen before in gov’t.

]]> http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2008/07/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-11878 Steve Radick Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:19:05 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=263#comment-11878 Jeffrey, just like with email and websites before, we’re soon going to reach the day where we’re not constantly being questioned on how much time we’re “wasting” on them. Websites and email are now just part of normal business, and blogs and other social media should join that group very soon. Ironically, it’s on traditional websites and email where we’re all now “wasting” all our time. Keep it up Jeffrey – there are plenty of supporters of your efforts, even if they don’t always comment directly.

]]> http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2008/07/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-8807 Roberto Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:23:42 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=263#comment-8807 Jeffrey, your efforts are certainly more worthy of a higher status than “blandest environmental blog”. I for one support all that you do and appreciate your work.

]]> http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2008/07/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-7182 gunky Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:24:33 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=263#comment-7182 I work in another federal agency and just found your blog. Frankly, I’m astonished (and hopeful) that you can get away with it. I don’t think our opinions would be encouraged for public consumption in my agency.

]]> http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2008/07/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-6008 Marcus Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:39:41 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=263#comment-6008 Make no mistake, this ain’t going away. A blog is a tool for communicating and collaborating (especially with a new generation that gets more and more of its information electronically). These are two things EPA can’t do enough of. It’s just a question of how best to use this tool to do that.

]]> http://blog.epa.gov/blog/2008/07/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-5893 Lina-EPA Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:29:39 +0000 http://blog.epa.gov/blog/?p=263#comment-5893 Well said. I think we have received many interesting responses. We’ll just learn from the experience and continue to make environmental information more readily available to the general public while leveraging technology.

]]>