Skip to content

Hollywood Doesn’t Always Portray Things From the Right ASPECT: Directors Cut

2013 January 11

I started watching the first season of Friday Night Lights during the holidays.  I’m not sure how I missed watching the show the first time around.  I’ve read the book by H.G. Bissinger a couple of times, and didn’t realize until the second read through that the kids were actually my age. In fact as a Penn Quaker I might have stared across the field at Permian’s tight end who went to Harvard.  I digress.  In one of the last episodes of the first season, a chemical accident causes their home game to be moved.  On screen the mayor of the town comes in and says something to the effect of, “EPA is shutting everything down.”  I chuckled knowing that if such an event occurred the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) not the EPA would be the folks who would have things well in hand and make any such call regarding risks to the public.  It reminded me of a post a made four years ago on another blog.  I’ve revised and extended my remarks in bold, italic, brackets, to cover an oversight I made in the initial post.

Movies require you to suspend your disbelief, but when you watch a film that hits close to home it can be tough. I have a friend in federal law enforcement who squirms when cardboard cutout agents run across the screen. Action flicks don’t do his profession justice, but at least his job is sometimes glorified on celluloid. The only two movies I can remember featuring a prominent EPA employee are Ghostbusters and the Simpsons Movie, [ok I was also reminded of  Fire Down Below but I will never admit to having watched that movie] neither of which ever made a kid say, “Man, when I grow up I want to work for the EPA.” On the off-chance your youngster was inspired to seek out public service please let them know we don’t inspect unlicensed nuclear storage facilities, nor do we have a fleet of helicopters. We do however, have one cool plane.

EPA’s Airborne Spectral Photometric Collection Technology, known as ASPECT, is an aircraft equipped with sensors that allow for surveillance of gaseous chemical releases from a safe distance. ASPECT gives emergency responders information regarding the shape, composition and concentration of gas plumes from disasters such as a derailed train, factory explosion or terrorist attack.

Since its inception ASPECT has flown over several fires, provided support during the Olympics and Columbia shuttle recovery, and supplied some of the first aerial images of the devastation along the coast during Katrina.

This was the scene in Kansas City outside our office windows in 2007 when a chemical facility went up in flames. ASPECT deployed and was instrumental in verifying that while ominous, the fire did not present a significant health threat to the community (the white signature you see below is the fire down below) [Fire Down Below credits "Anonymous" as the writer...Still on the fence about watching?].

Most of the technology you see in movies is sheer fantasy, but EPA’s high-tech plane and the scientists who operate it are worthy of a spot in the next summer blockbuster. Here’s hoping for the appearance of an EPA scientist who isn’t a bad guy (although with my face the best I could hope for is Thug #4 in the next straight to DVD clunker) [OK, Steven Seagal is supposed to be a good guy but I'll let you be the judge].

Jeffery Robichaud is a second generation EPA scientist who has worked for the Agency since 1998. He currently serves as Deputy Director of EPA Region 7′s Environmental Services Division. During highschool Jeff used to work at West Coast Video, where he watched most of Seagal’s work in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed in Greenversations are those of the author. They do not reflect EPA policy, endorsement, or action, and EPA does not verify the accuracy or science of the contents of the blog.

Tags:
5 Responses leave one →
  1. Cynthia Cassel permalink
    January 15, 2013

    I fully understand your pain, Jeff. Recently watching ‘Vegas’ when EPA was mentioned 3 times (in the wrong context) in the same show. My husband says if I don’t quit groaning loudly every time this happens, he’s going to report me as a noise pollution violator. I just don’t understand why the research staff can’t take 10 minutes to find out what we do and don’t do. Well, you say that I’m a dreamer…but I’m not the only one.

    • jrobicha permalink*
      January 16, 2013

      I’ve been meaning to watch that show Cynthia…big Michael Chiklis (sp?) fans in our house. I think I vaguely remember an EPA reference on BONES once too. Anyone else remember EPA being mentioned on TV? What was the context? And more importantly (or interestingly) was it in the correct context?
      Thanks!

      • Cynthia Cassel permalink
        January 22, 2013

        Sorry, but I must post a retraction. My husband reminded me that “Vegas” was set in the 1960′s, long before EPA was “born”. The show I was thinking of was CSI (set in Las Vegas). The situation was a mass grave that was uncovered and someone mentioned “EPA is going to be all over this.” For what I can’t imagine; air pollution? Water pollution (in the desert)? Yikes, what a boo-boo.

  2. http://ipanks.com/ permalink
    May 18, 2013

    I really appreciate this post. I’ve been looking all over for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You’ve made my day! Thanks again

  3. Entertainment Live Updates permalink
    September 24, 2013

    Really good post! Hope there will be more good post here!Thanks for sharing valuable information.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS